Discussion about this post

User's avatar
louise johnson's avatar

I couldn't agree more. Sometimes I get apoplectic at the excesses of gender ideology and I find myself thinking "they" should ruthlessly outlaw any kind of transition from one gender to another - socially, hormonally and surgically, huff, puff, snort !!! And then I come to in a puddle of cold froth and I realize the problem is with the "they". Because the "they" never stays the same, does it? I've lived long enough to watch the pendulum swing over and over. The only thing protecting us from the wrong kind of "they" in positions of power is tolerance of difference and respect for the everyone's right to self determination.

Expand full comment
Ollie Parks's avatar

There's an unresolved tension here.

On the one hand:

"This also led to the great drama surrounding pronouns, where my contribution always has been and always will be that I will not control people’s private choice of words."

On the other hand:

"My fundamental problem has always been that this is a pathologically controlling movement that forces people to profess their beliefs in absurdities under threat of job termination and social ostracization."

Preferred pronouns are one of the ways the gender identity movement forces people to profess their belief in absurditites or risk punishment in their vocational and personal lives. The fundamental absurdity is the belief in the existence of something called gender identity that exists independently from biological sex and culturally determined sex roles. That absurdity has bred the absurd ideas that people can find themselves trapped in the wrong sex or gender identity and that to obtain relief from that condition they can change sex or gender or do away with their gender and sex altogether by claiming to be nonbinary.

In the current climate, the use of a trans person's personal pronouns is not a private choice of words. The personal here is highly political. Other people's failure to signal their agreement with the absurdities of gender identity ideology by using trans or nonbinary pronouns can have adverse personal consequences. For example, some social media and mainstream media such as The Washington Post will take down comments that flout the new personal pronoun conventions. They may even suspend or terminate users' accounts for the sin of transphobia. Noncompliance in the workplace could turn the dissident into a pariah among his or her peers and trigger disciplinary action up to and including termination.

I will not be forced to publicly profess my belief in the absurdity of personal pronouns by honoring them in speech or in writing. For example, I will never refer to the ACLU's queer terror Chase Strangio by any pronouns other than she/her. To do otherwise would be to surrender to gender absurdities and empower one of the most effective and pernicious evangelists of gender ideology.

If I hear a stranger or acquaintance use a trans person's preferred pronouns, am I going to confront them? No. What if the speaker is a friend or relative? Depending on the circumstances, I may say nothing or explain that I do not refer to people by pronouns that are incongruent with their biological sex. In online gender critical forums I will always advocate not complying with the personal pronoun mandate.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts