It would be interesting to know the percentage of trans women prisoners who were living as women before they committed the crime for which they were sent to jail.
If I could snap my fingers and make things happen, I'd put the practice of housing men who claim to be women with female inmates to a popular referendum. It is difficult to believe that a majority of the population would support it, especially if they knew that a disproportionately high percentage are sex offenders. Publishing sample photos of male inmates presenting as women would drive home that they're not Bambi-like sympathetic trans kids.
Just FYI I actually did do a little edit to the piece that mentions what little info there is on that and it comes from one of the Canadian reports: "Almost all (94%) had committed their offences while living as their biological sex."
This is somewhat inconsequential to me when talking about these bad policies because I don't really care WHY they say they are trans or when they started saying it, as they get to request transfer anyway. But it's still an interesting conversation to have when talking about this demographic!
From an advocacy standpoint, if one were arguing for the abolition a policy of placing trans women in women's prisons, and if one seeking to influence public opinion, the case for discontinuing the practice would be much stronger if it could be shown that the prisoners' claims to be trans were false and made for the sole purpose of escaping the harsh conditions of a men's prison.
Policymakers who have been captured by gender ideology might not care, but I bet the public would.
I'm a sex realist, so I understand and accept both your points. Men, especially older ones, make very ugly women.
That does not stop some men from going about in public in their sad AGP drag.
What I am interested in is the sincerity of these men's claims to be trans women. If they socially or medically transitioned before they were arrested, their claim to be trans would be more plausible than if they had no prior history of expressing their (imaginary) female identity until it became expedient to do so.
The early "transitioners" are the most dangerous in my experience. The one who started stalking me in 1968 is still doing it. Last time I saw him at a Lesbian event, he put my name on his name tag. In what used to be a Lesbian journal, "Sinister Wisdom," he is "interviewed" slandering me in the most disgusting way possible. They would not print my response. He gets massive support from Lesbians where I live, but I am in literal danger since they are most likely to assault and kill women they know. Others from that time are so Lesbian-hating also.
I don't believe for a minute that they want to be women or believe they are. It's all a fetish and obsession.
Thank you. I'm not the only one. Sinister Wisdom had previously printed a man who had murdered his wife when she found him wearing her clothes.
Then there was the triple hate crime murder in Oakland by David Warfield/Dana Rivers, one of the men who patrolled at the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival with spears, machetes, etc. threatening women and girls there. He's a white man who later murdered an interracial Lesbian couple and their African-born son in Oakland. He stabbed one of the Lesbians over 40 times in her face, set their house on fire (so could have killed many more in Oakland). He's now in a women's prison, with more women to harass and assault.
Thanks so much. I once again posted on my page. Hopefully we won't get as much hate this time. So one of my senators Jon Osseff is a moderate Democrat. I've emailed him about men in women's prisons so much. He's doing an evaluation of federal prisons with a republican. A few months ago a judge was put forth to confirm by a committee he was on for the federal bench. She had let a man into a women's prison and two women were injured badly. He was the tie breaking vote and voted against her because of it. I thanked him profusely. I know it's hard to go against your own party and president but he did. I was about to give up, but all that writing does help.
I hope to begin seen a change from “trans activists” to “delusion activists”. I’m sure there are men who sincerely believe their delusion - that’s a property of delusion. “I sincerely believe I’m Jesus Christ”. Likewise, non-delusional men are simply fetishists. It’s enormously clarifying.
“Sex delusional and sex fetishistic male prisoners demand to be transferred to female-only prisoners to affirm their delusion and support their fetish.”
There’s an enormous power to language to hide.
Or clarify. “Trans” activists will have to defend constantly that a delusion isn’t a delusion or fetish.
It would be interesting to know the percentage of trans women prisoners who were living as women before they committed the crime for which they were sent to jail.
If I could snap my fingers and make things happen, I'd put the practice of housing men who claim to be women with female inmates to a popular referendum. It is difficult to believe that a majority of the population would support it, especially if they knew that a disproportionately high percentage are sex offenders. Publishing sample photos of male inmates presenting as women would drive home that they're not Bambi-like sympathetic trans kids.
Just FYI I actually did do a little edit to the piece that mentions what little info there is on that and it comes from one of the Canadian reports: "Almost all (94%) had committed their offences while living as their biological sex."
This is somewhat inconsequential to me when talking about these bad policies because I don't really care WHY they say they are trans or when they started saying it, as they get to request transfer anyway. But it's still an interesting conversation to have when talking about this demographic!
From an advocacy standpoint, if one were arguing for the abolition a policy of placing trans women in women's prisons, and if one seeking to influence public opinion, the case for discontinuing the practice would be much stronger if it could be shown that the prisoners' claims to be trans were false and made for the sole purpose of escaping the harsh conditions of a men's prison.
Policymakers who have been captured by gender ideology might not care, but I bet the public would.
They are not women though and therefore can't live as women since they are incredibly obvious. And no one is trans.
I'm a sex realist, so I understand and accept both your points. Men, especially older ones, make very ugly women.
That does not stop some men from going about in public in their sad AGP drag.
What I am interested in is the sincerity of these men's claims to be trans women. If they socially or medically transitioned before they were arrested, their claim to be trans would be more plausible than if they had no prior history of expressing their (imaginary) female identity until it became expedient to do so.
The early "transitioners" are the most dangerous in my experience. The one who started stalking me in 1968 is still doing it. Last time I saw him at a Lesbian event, he put my name on his name tag. In what used to be a Lesbian journal, "Sinister Wisdom," he is "interviewed" slandering me in the most disgusting way possible. They would not print my response. He gets massive support from Lesbians where I live, but I am in literal danger since they are most likely to assault and kill women they know. Others from that time are so Lesbian-hating also.
I don't believe for a minute that they want to be women or believe they are. It's all a fetish and obsession.
I am very sorry to hear that. What is happening to you is wrong. It should not have to be like this.
Thank you. I'm not the only one. Sinister Wisdom had previously printed a man who had murdered his wife when she found him wearing her clothes.
Then there was the triple hate crime murder in Oakland by David Warfield/Dana Rivers, one of the men who patrolled at the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival with spears, machetes, etc. threatening women and girls there. He's a white man who later murdered an interracial Lesbian couple and their African-born son in Oakland. He stabbed one of the Lesbians over 40 times in her face, set their house on fire (so could have killed many more in Oakland). He's now in a women's prison, with more women to harass and assault.
Thank you so much. This is so excellent and needed.
Thank you! :)
Good work, Eva!
Thank you very much!!
Thanks so much. I once again posted on my page. Hopefully we won't get as much hate this time. So one of my senators Jon Osseff is a moderate Democrat. I've emailed him about men in women's prisons so much. He's doing an evaluation of federal prisons with a republican. A few months ago a judge was put forth to confirm by a committee he was on for the federal bench. She had let a man into a women's prison and two women were injured badly. He was the tie breaking vote and voted against her because of it. I thanked him profusely. I know it's hard to go against your own party and president but he did. I was about to give up, but all that writing does help.
Well written as always.
I hope to begin seen a change from “trans activists” to “delusion activists”. I’m sure there are men who sincerely believe their delusion - that’s a property of delusion. “I sincerely believe I’m Jesus Christ”. Likewise, non-delusional men are simply fetishists. It’s enormously clarifying.
“Sex delusional and sex fetishistic male prisoners demand to be transferred to female-only prisoners to affirm their delusion and support their fetish.”
There’s an enormous power to language to hide.
Or clarify. “Trans” activists will have to defend constantly that a delusion isn’t a delusion or fetish.